Jarvis v. Contractor Securitas Security

Fourth Circuit

Jarvis v. Contractor Securitas Security

474 F. App'x 271

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 25, 2012·No. No. 12-1242·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Derek N. Jarvis appeals the district court’s order granting Contractor Securi-[272] tas Security’s motion to dismiss and dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jarvis v. Securitas Sec. Serv. USA, Inc., No. 8:11— cv-00654-AW, 2012 WL 527597 (D.Md. Feb. 16, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Derek N. Jarvis appeals the district court’s order granting Contractor Securi-[272] tas Security’s motion to dismiss and dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jarvis v. Securitas Sec. Serv. USA, Inc., No. 8:11— cv-00654-AW, 2012 WL 527597 (D.Md. Feb. 16, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Jarvis v. Contractor Securitas Security, 474 F. App'x 271 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

474 F. App'x 271 (Jarvis v. Contractor Securitas Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related