Jarrett v. Ford Motor Credit Company

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Jarrett v. Ford Motor Credit Company

344 S.E.2d 440, 178 Ga. App. 600, 1986 Ga. App. LEXIS 1751

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMarch 19, 1986

Docket71730

StatusPublished

Cited by10 cases

This text of 344 S.E.2d 440 (Jarrett v. Ford Motor Credit Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jarrett v. Ford Motor Credit Company, 344 S.E.2d 440, 178 Ga. App. 600, 1986 Ga. App. LEXIS 1751 (Ga. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

Sognier, Judge.

Ford Motor Credit Company (Ford Motor) brought this action against Gary Jarrett seeking $1,482.18, the alleged balance due on a lease contract. Jarrett filed a direct appeal from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Ford Motor for $1,482.18 principal plus $173.22 attorney fees.

“ ‘ “It is not only the right but the duty of a reviewing or appellate court to raise the question of its jurisdiction in all cases in which there may be any doubt as to the existence of such jurisdiction.” [Cit.]’ [Cit.]” Atlantic-Canadian Corp. v. Hammer &c. Assoc., 167 Ga. App. 257 (1) (306 SE2d 22) (1983). Although OCGA § 9-11-56 (h) provides that “[a]n order granting summary judgment on any issue or as to any party shall be subject to review by appeal,” this statute does not provide for direct appeals from all grants of summary judgment, but must be read in conjunction with OCGA §§ 5-6-34 and 5-6-35 regarding the procedure for appeal to this court. See Hawes v. Dinkler, 224 Ga. 785, 789 (2) (164 SE2d 799) (1968). Effective July 1, 1984, applications for discretionary appeals are required in “[a]ppeals in all actions for damages in which the judgment is $2,500.00 or less.” *601 OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (6). This statute unambiguously refers to “judgments” in general and we therefore construe it to be applicable to judgments in the amount of $2,500 or less obtained by verdict following a bench or jury trial as well as by summary judgment. See generally Irwin v. Busbee, 241 Ga. 567 (247 SE2d 103) (1978). Thus, because the appellant failed to follow the provisions required by OCGA § 5-6-35 (b) for cases in which an application for appeal is required, this direct appeal must be dismissed. Simpkins v. Minks, 175 Ga. App. 729 (334 SE2d 340) (1985). See also Brown v. Assoc. Fin. Svcs. Corp., 255 Ga. 457 (339 SE2d 590) (1986).

Decided March 19, 1986 Rehearing denied April 3, 1986. William H. Turner, Jr., for appellant. Daniel F. Bridgers, for appellees.

Appeal dismissed.

Banke, C. J., and Birdsong, P. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sognier, Judge.

Ford Motor Credit Company (Ford Motor) brought this action against Gary Jarrett seeking $1,482.18, the alleged balance due on a lease contract. Jarrett filed a direct appeal from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Ford Motor for $1,482.18 principal plus $173.22 attorney fees.

“ ‘ “It is not only the right but the duty of a reviewing or appellate court to raise the question of its jurisdiction in all cases in which there may be any doubt as to the existence of such jurisdiction.” [Cit.]’ [Cit.]” Atlantic-Canadian Corp. v. Hammer &c. Assoc., 167 Ga. App. 257 (1) (306 SE2d 22) (1983). Although OCGA § 9-11-56 (h) provides that “[a]n order granting summary judgment on any issue or as to any party shall be subject to review by appeal,” this statute does not provide for direct appeals from all grants of summary judgment, but must be read in conjunction with OCGA §§ 5-6-34 and 5-6-35 regarding the procedure for appeal to this court. See Hawes v. Dinkler, 224 Ga. 785, 789 (2) (164 SE2d 799) (1968). Effective July 1, 1984, applications for discretionary appeals are required in “[a]ppeals in all actions for damages in which the judgment is $2,500.00 or less.” *601 OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (6). This statute unambiguously refers to “judgments” in general and we therefore construe it to be applicable to judgments in the amount of $2,500 or less obtained by verdict following a bench or jury trial as well as by summary judgment. See generally Irwin v. Busbee, 241 Ga. 567 (247 SE2d 103) (1978). Thus, because the appellant failed to follow the provisions required by OCGA § 5-6-35 (b) for cases in which an application for appeal is required, this direct appeal must be dismissed. Simpkins v. Minks, 175 Ga. App. 729 (334 SE2d 340) (1985). See also Brown v. Assoc. Fin. Svcs. Corp., 255 Ga. 457 (339 SE2d 590) (1986).

Decided March 19, 1986 Rehearing denied April 3, 1986. William H. Turner, Jr., for appellant. Daniel F. Bridgers, for appellees.

Appeal dismissed.

Banke, C. J., and Birdsong, P. J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

344 S.E.2d 440, 178 Ga. App. 600, 1986 Ga. App. LEXIS 1751, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jarrett-v-ford-motor-credit-company-gactapp-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack