Janes v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Janes v. State

1917 OK CR 214, 167 P. 201, 14 Okla. Crim. 679, 1917 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 187

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedOctober 13, 1917

DocketNo. A-2805.

StatusPublished

This text of 1917 OK CR 214 (Janes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Janes v. State, 1917 OK CR 214, 167 P. 201, 14 Okla. Crim. 679, 1917 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 187 (Okla. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

PER OURIAM.

This is an appeal from the county court of Garfield county, wherein the plaintiff in error was convicted of the crime of selling intoxicating liquors and his punishment fixed at the minimum fine of $50 and imprisonment for 30 days in the county jail. No brief has been filed in behalf of the plaintiff in error, and the cause was submitted on motion by the Attorney General to affirm- the same for want of prosecution. An examination of the record discloses that the proof on the párt of the state fully sustains the allegations of the information and no defense was interposed, although the proof of the sale was positively sworn to by two witnesses.

The judgment is affirmed. Mandate forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER OURIAM.

This is an appeal from the county court of Garfield county, wherein the plaintiff in error was convicted of the crime of selling intoxicating liquors and his punishment fixed at the minimum fine of $50 and imprisonment for 30 days in the county jail. No brief has been filed in behalf of the plaintiff in error, and the cause was submitted on motion by the Attorney General to affirm- the same for want of prosecution. An examination of the record discloses that the proof on the párt of the state fully sustains the allegations of the information and no defense was interposed, although the proof of the sale was positively sworn to by two witnesses.

The judgment is affirmed. Mandate forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1917 OK CR 214, 167 P. 201, 14 Okla. Crim. 679, 1917 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/janes-v-state-oklacrimapp-1917.