Janes v. State
This text of 1919 OK CR 41 (Janes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiffs in error were jointly charged, tried and convicted on an information charging that they did keep a place in the city of Enid with the intent and purpose of selling intoxicating liquors. The jury fixed the punishment of Berry Janes at five years in the penitentiary and a fine of $50, and the punishment of Sarah Trieber at two years in the penitentiary and a fine of $50. An appeal was perfected.
This was a prosecution under section 4, c. 26. Session Laws 1913. The Attorney General has filed a confession of error, on the ground that said statute was, in the case of Proctor v. State, 15 Okla. Cr. 338, 176 Pac. 771, held unconstitutional and void. For the reasons stated in the Proctor Case, the confession of error is sustained, and the judgment herein reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1919 OK CR 41, 177 P. 626, 15 Okla. Crim. 674, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 32, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/janes-v-state-oklacrimapp-1919.