Janaf, Incorporated v. John W. Daniel & Company, Incorporated

Fourth Circuit

Janaf, Incorporated v. John W. Daniel & Company, Incorporated

262 F.2d 958, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4529

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 22, 1959

Docket7689

StatusPublished

This text of 262 F.2d 958 (Janaf, Incorporated v. John W. Daniel & Company, Incorporated) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Janaf, Incorporated v. John W. Daniel & Company, Incorporated, 262 F.2d 958, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4529 (4th Cir. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, .Janaf, Inc., a real estate development corporation, con *959 tracted with the appellee, John W. Daniel & Company, Inc., for the construction of a number of houses on Janaf’s land. Controversies arising between the parties, they entered into an arbitration agreement. The arbitrators made an award, the validity of which Janaf attacks. It contends that the arbitration agreement is void because it prohibited the parties from resorting to the courts. The appellant also asserts that the arbitrators mistakenly disregarded certain provisions of the arbitration agreement.

We find no merit in any of the appellant’s contentions. No good purpose would be served by setting forth in detail the facts of the case or the arguments. These have been fully considered by the District Court in a thorough and careful opinion which we adopt as our own. See 169 F.Supp. 219.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, .Janaf, Inc., a real estate development corporation, con *959 tracted with the appellee, John W. Daniel & Company, Inc., for the construction of a number of houses on Janaf’s land. Controversies arising between the parties, they entered into an arbitration agreement. The arbitrators made an award, the validity of which Janaf attacks. It contends that the arbitration agreement is void because it prohibited the parties from resorting to the courts. The appellant also asserts that the arbitrators mistakenly disregarded certain provisions of the arbitration agreement.

We find no merit in any of the appellant’s contentions. No good purpose would be served by setting forth in detail the facts of the case or the arguments. These have been fully considered by the District Court in a thorough and careful opinion which we adopt as our own. See 169 F.Supp. 219.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

262 F.2d 958, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4529, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/janaf-incorporated-v-john-w-daniel-company-incorporated-ca4-1959.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack