Jamison v. Ford Motor Co.
This text of 683 S.E.2d 803 (Jamison v. Ford Motor Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Eugene JAMISON and Delores Isaac, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Virnell Isaac, Petitioners,
v.
FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Respondent.
Supreme Court of South Carolina.
James E. Carter, of Savannah, GA,; Samuel K. Allen, of Anastopoulo and Clone, of Charleston; and Stephanie P. McDonald, of Senn, McDonald & Leinbach, of Charleston, for Petitioners.
J. Kenneth Carter, Jr. and Curtis L. Ott, both of Turner, Padget, Graham & Laney, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM.
After careful consideration, the writ of certiorari is
DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.
TOAL, C.J., WALLER, PLEICONES, BEATTY, JJ., and Acting Justice JAMES E. MOORE, concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
683 S.E.2d 803, 385 S.C. 238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jamison-v-ford-motor-co-sc-2009.