James Virgil Counts v. United States

263 F.2d 603
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMarch 26, 1959
Docket17490
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 263 F.2d 603 (James Virgil Counts v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James Virgil Counts v. United States, 263 F.2d 603 (5th Cir. 1959).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a Section 2255 proceeding, 28 U.S.C.A. Appellant, on a plea of guilty, was convicted in two separate cases involving robbery of two banks on two distinct occasions. In each case he was *604 charged under separate counts with entry with intent to commit larceny, 18 U.S.C.A. § 2113(a), and with felony bank larceny, 18 U.S.C.A. § 2113(b). Originally the sentence in each case was 15 years on both counts to be served concurrently. This error was corrected and the sentence under the larceny count, 18 U.S.C.A. § 2113(b), was reduced to 10 years. The remaining 15-year sentence for the unlawful entry was within the 20-year maximum under Section 2113 (a).

As have so many others, appellant now urges, on the basis of Prince v. United States, 1957, 352 U.S. 322, 77 S.Ct. 403,1 L.Ed.2d 370, that, since a larceny actually took place, the entry with felonious intent, Section 2113(a), merged into the larceny, Section 2113(b), so that the maximum sentence was 10 years. For the reasons pointed out in United States v. Williamson, 5 Cir., 1958, 255 F.2d 512, we disagree. To this may be added Purdom v. United States, 10 Cir., 1957, 249 F.2d 822, certiorari denied 355 U.S. 913, 78 S.Ct. 341, 2 L.Ed.2d 273; LaDuke v. United States, 8 Cir., 1958, 253 F.2d 387; Kitts v. United States, 8 Cir., 1957, 243 F.2d 883.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

U.S. v. Jones
Fifth Circuit, 1993
United States v. David Goudy and Cynthia King
792 F.2d 664 (Seventh Circuit, 1986)
United States v. Dennis Keith Fried
436 F.2d 784 (Sixth Circuit, 1971)
Harry R. Smith v. United States
356 F.2d 868 (Eighth Circuit, 1966)
John Robert Sawyer v. United States
312 F.2d 24 (Eighth Circuit, 1963)
United States v. Lawrenson
196 F. Supp. 838 (D. Maryland, 1961)
Yancy Douglas Hardy v. United States
292 F.2d 192 (Eighth Circuit, 1961)
United States v. James Joseph Leather
271 F.2d 80 (Seventh Circuit, 1959)
Ellis Raymond Williamson v. United States
265 F.2d 236 (Fifth Circuit, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
263 F.2d 603, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-virgil-counts-v-united-states-ca5-1959.