James v. State
969 So. 2d 1115, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 17720, 2007 WL 3274923
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in James v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 886 So. 2d 1032 →
Opinion
The summary denial of appellant’s rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence is affirmed, but without prejudice to appellant seeking relief through administrative remedies or a proper, timely rule 3.850 motion. See Canty v. State, 884 So.2d 123 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
James v. State, 969 So. 2d 1115, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 17720, 2007 WL 3274923 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).
969 So. 2d 1115 (James v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Canty v. State
884 So. 2d 123 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)