James v. State
868 So. 2d 1225, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3499, 2004 WL 524908
This text of 868 So. 2d 1225 (James v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
James v. State, 868 So. 2d 1225, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3499, 2004 WL 524908 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s denial of the appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence. See Pitts v. State, 855 So.2d 681 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); State v. Franklin, 836 So.2d 1112 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003), review granted, 854 So.2d 659 (Fla.2003). We certify conflict with Taylor v. State, 818 So.2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), review dismissed, 821 So.2d 302 (Fla.2002).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Taylor v. State
818 So. 2d 544 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
State v. Franklin
836 So. 2d 1112 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Pitts v. State
855 So. 2d 681 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
868 So. 2d 1225, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3499, 2004 WL 524908, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.