James v. State
868 So. 2d 1225, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3499, 2004 WL 524908
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in James v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 843 So. 2d 933 →
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s denial of the appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence. See Pitts v. State, 855 So.2d 681 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); State v. Franklin, 836 So.2d 1112 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003), review granted, 854 So.2d 659 (Fla.2003). We certify conflict with Taylor v. State, 818 So.2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), review dismissed, 821 So.2d 302 (Fla.2002).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
James v. State, 868 So. 2d 1225, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3499, 2004 WL 524908 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
868 So. 2d 1225 (James v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Taylor v. State
818 So. 2d 544 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
State v. Franklin
836 So. 2d 1112 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Pitts v. State
855 So. 2d 681 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)