James v. State

798 So. 2d 799, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15040, 2001 WL 1267516
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 24, 2001·No. No. 4D01-3133·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the summary denial of Appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Wood v. State, 750 So.2d 592 (Fla.1999). Appellant fails to allege a meritorious claim in that he alleges absolutely no facts to support his claim. See Bartz v. State, 740 So.2d 1243 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)(holding that generalized complaint is not legally sufficient to sustain a writ of error coram nobis, as it does not “allege specific facts of such a vital nature that, had they been known to the trial court, they conclusively would have prevented entry of judgment.”).

STONE, FARMER, and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James v. State, 798 So. 2d 799, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15040, 2001 WL 1267516 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

798 So. 2d 799 (James v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shulmister v. City of Pompano Beach
798 So. 2d 799 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)