James v. State

773 So. 2d 659, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16826, 2000 WL 1867581
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 22, 2000·No. No. 1D00-0828·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Before sentencing, Rose James moved to withdraw her previously accepted plea. She argued below that, before she agreed to the plea, her court-appointed attorney withheld depositions and other documents that would have led to her acquittal. We agree with her contention here that these circumstances created a conflict of interest between Ms. James and her attorney. Accordingly, we reverse and remand with directions to appoint conflict-free counsel to represent Ms. James in further proceedings on the motion to withdraw her plea. See Zeiszler v. State, 765 So.2d 128, 129 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); Padgett v. State, 743 So.2d 70, 74 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Holifield v. State, 717 So.2d 69, 69 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). We express no view on the merits of the motion to withdraw the plea.

MINER, ALLEN, and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James v. State, 773 So. 2d 659, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16826, 2000 WL 1867581 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

773 So. 2d 659 (James v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lewis v. State
812 So. 2d 597 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)