James v. State

597 So. 2d 969, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 5215, 1992 WL 92452
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in James v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 556 So. 2d 791
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 8, 1992·No. No. 91-00819·Published

Opinion

DANAHY, Acting Chief Judge.

On a revocation of probation the trial court in sentencing the appellant departed upward more than one cell based on the appellant’s having had multiple violations of probation in this case. Subsequently, the Florida Supreme Court held that multiple violations of probation are not a proper reason for a guidelines departure. Williams v. State, 594 So.2d 284 (Fla.1992). Williams also held, however, that “where there are multiple violations of probation, the sentence may be successively bumped to one higher cell for each violation.” Therefore, the sentence in this case is set aside and the cause remanded for resen-tencing consistent with Williams. See also O’Keefe v. State, 595 So.2d 291 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992).

Reversed and remanded.

THREADGILL, J„ and CASE, JAMES R., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James v. State, 597 So. 2d 969, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 5215, 1992 WL 92452 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

597 So. 2d 969 (James v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

O'KEEFE v. State
595 So. 2d 291 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Williams v. State
594 So. 2d 284 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)