James v. State
575 So. 2d 335, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2178, 1991 WL 31839
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 12, 1991·No. No. 90-367·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
ON CONFESSION OF ERROR
Based on Pineda v. State, 571 So.2d 105 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990), the State concedes that the trial court committed reversible error by limiting voir dire to twenty minutes, where there were twenty-nine potential jurors and the charges were attempted first degree murder of a police officer and robbery. Because there must be a new trial, we need not reach appellant’s second point on appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
James v. State, 575 So. 2d 335, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2178, 1991 WL 31839 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).
575 So. 2d 335 (James v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
O'HARA v. State
642 So. 2d 592 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Zitnick v. State
576 So. 2d 1381 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)