James v. State

243 So. 2d 187
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in James v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 223 So. 2d 52
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 20, 1971·No. No. 70-282·Published

Opinion

LILES, Acting Chief Judge.

Donnie James was charged with robbery and tried before a jury in the Court of Record of Lee County. He was found guilty of the offense of grand larceny.

Appellant James contends the trial court erred in failing to give a jury instruction on petit larceny as a lesser included offense. Defense counsel submitted his requested instructions in writing to the trial judge at the proper time, and the instruction on petit larceny was denied.

The decision of the Florida Supreme Court in Brown v. State, Fla.1968, 206 So. 2d 377, is controlling in the instant case. Appellant was entitled to a jury instruction on petit larceny. See also Hand v. State and Raulerson v. State, Fla.1967, 199 So.2d 100; Jerry v. State, Fla.App. 1968, 213 So.2d 440, cert, denied, Fla.1969, 222 So.2d 747.

For the foregoing reasons the judgment of the Court of Record is hereby reversed and remanded for a new trial.

HOBSON and McNULTY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James v. State, 243 So. 2d 187 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).

243 So. 2d 187 (James v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jerry v. State
213 So. 2d 440 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)
Hand v. State
199 So. 2d 100 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1967)
Brown v. State
206 So. 2d 377 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1968)