James v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

James v. State

243 So. 2d 187

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 20, 1971

DocketNo. 70-282

StatusPublished

This text of 243 So. 2d 187 (James v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James v. State, 243 So. 2d 187 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

LILES, Acting Chief Judge.

Donnie James was charged with robbery and tried before a jury in the Court of Record of Lee County. He was found guilty of the offense of grand larceny.

Appellant James contends the trial court erred in failing to give a jury instruction on petit larceny as a lesser included offense. Defense counsel submitted his requested instructions in writing to the trial judge at the proper time, and the instruction on petit larceny was denied.

The decision of the Florida Supreme Court in Brown v. State, Fla.1968, 206 So. 2d 377, is controlling in the instant case. Appellant was entitled to a jury instruction on petit larceny. See also Hand v. State and Raulerson v. State, Fla.1967, 199 So.2d 100; Jerry v. State, Fla.App. 1968, 213 So.2d 440, cert, denied, Fla.1969, 222 So.2d 747.

For the foregoing reasons the judgment of the Court of Record is hereby reversed and remanded for a new trial.

HOBSON and McNULTY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LILES, Acting Chief Judge.

Donnie James was charged with robbery and tried before a jury in the Court of Record of Lee County. He was found guilty of the offense of grand larceny.

Appellant James contends the trial court erred in failing to give a jury instruction on petit larceny as a lesser included offense. Defense counsel submitted his requested instructions in writing to the trial judge at the proper time, and the instruction on petit larceny was denied.

The decision of the Florida Supreme Court in Brown v. State, Fla.1968, 206 So. 2d 377, is controlling in the instant case. Appellant was entitled to a jury instruction on petit larceny. See also Hand v. State and Raulerson v. State, Fla.1967, 199 So.2d 100; Jerry v. State, Fla.App. 1968, 213 So.2d 440, cert, denied, Fla.1969, 222 So.2d 747.

For the foregoing reasons the judgment of the Court of Record is hereby reversed and remanded for a new trial.

HOBSON and McNULTY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

243 So. 2d 187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-state-fladistctapp-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack