James v. Hogan

48 N.W.2d 756, 154 Neb. 640, 1951 Neb. LEXIS 127
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in James v. Hogan. Read the opinion of the Court — 154 Neb. 306
Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided July 16, 1951·No. 32918·Published

Opinion

SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION

Heard before Simmons, C. J., Carter, Messmore, Yeager, Chappell, Wenke, and Boslaugh, JJ.

Boslaugh, J.

A motion to retax the costs accrued in this case has been submitted. The case has been re-examined and it is concluded that the opinion herein be and is modified by eliminating from it the words “all costs of the action in both courts should be and they are taxed to the defendant” and by requiring in lieu thereof that the taxable costs made and accrued subsequent to the filing of the last pleading before the commencement of the first trial of this case in the district court until the dismissal of the appeal to this court by the defendant from the first judgment should be and they are taxed to Gilson James, the plaintiff, and that all other costs of the action in both courts should be and they are taxed to Everett Hogan, the defendant.

Motion to retax costs sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James v. Hogan, 48 N.W.2d 756, 154 Neb. 640, 1951 Neb. LEXIS 127 (Neb. 1951).

48 N.W.2d 756 (James v. Hogan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. v. Board of Equalization
48 N.W.2d 756 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1951)