James v. Hogan

Nebraska Supreme Court

James v. Hogan

48 N.W.2d 756, 154 Neb. 640, 1951 Neb. LEXIS 127

CourtNebraska Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 16, 1951

Docket32918

StatusPublished

This text of 48 N.W.2d 756 (James v. Hogan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James v. Hogan, 48 N.W.2d 756, 154 Neb. 640, 1951 Neb. LEXIS 127 (Neb. 1951).

Pincite

Opinion

SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION

Heard before Simmons, C. J., Carter, Messmore, Yeager, Chappell, Wenke, and Boslaugh, JJ.

Boslaugh, J.

A motion to retax the costs accrued in this case has been submitted. The case has been re-examined and it is concluded that the opinion herein be and is modified by eliminating from it the words “all costs of the action in both courts should be and they are taxed to the defendant” and by requiring in lieu thereof that the taxable costs made and accrued subsequent to the filing of the last pleading before the commencement of the first trial of this case in the district court until the dismissal of the appeal to this court by the defendant from the first judgment should be and they are taxed to Gilson James, the plaintiff, and that all other costs of the action in both courts should be and they are taxed to Everett Hogan, the defendant.

Motion to retax costs sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION

Heard before Simmons, C. J., Carter, Messmore, Yeager, Chappell, Wenke, and Boslaugh, JJ.

Boslaugh, J.

A motion to retax the costs accrued in this case has been submitted. The case has been re-examined and it is concluded that the opinion herein be and is modified by eliminating from it the words “all costs of the action in both courts should be and they are taxed to the defendant” and by requiring in lieu thereof that the taxable costs made and accrued subsequent to the filing of the last pleading before the commencement of the first trial of this case in the district court until the dismissal of the appeal to this court by the defendant from the first judgment should be and they are taxed to Gilson James, the plaintiff, and that all other costs of the action in both courts should be and they are taxed to Everett Hogan, the defendant.

Motion to retax costs sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

48 N.W.2d 756, 154 Neb. 640, 1951 Neb. LEXIS 127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-hogan-neb-1951.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack