James v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon·Decided April 12, 2022·No. 6:20-cv-02136·Unknown

Opinion

Sherwood J. Reese Sherwood.reese@comcast.net Luke Moen-Johnson sherwoodreese@comcast.net Drew L. Johnson, P.C. 1700 Valley River Drive Eugene, OR 97401 (541) 434-6466

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES COURT DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF OREGON

KAREN J. JAMES, Civil No. 6:20-cv-02136-HL

Plaintiff, ORDER FOR ATTORNEY FEES vs. PURSUANT TO EAJA

Commissioner of Social Security Administration,

Defendant. ____________________________________

After considering the Stipulated Motion of the parties submitted herein, Order hereby grants that Commissioner shall pay Plaintiff’s attorney the sum of $11,964.70 upon verification that Plaintiff has no debt to the government which qualifies for offset against the awarded fees, pursuant to the reasoning in Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 130 S. Ct. 2521, 2527 (2010) (EAJA 1 – ORDER FOR ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO EAJA awards fees subject “to a federal administrative offset if the Litigant has outstanding federal debts”) for full settlement of all claims for fees under EAJA. If Plaintiff has no such federal debt, payment of $11,964.70 shall be made to Plaintiff’s attorneys, Drew L. Johnson, P.C., and mailed to their office at 1700 Valley River Drive, Eugene, OR 97401. If Plaintiff has such debt, the check for any remaining funds after offset shall be made out to Plaintiff and mailed to counsel’s office at the address provided above. IT IS SO ORDERED this day of April 12th, 2022 Us NN ML

PRESENTED BY: /s/SHERWOOD J.REESE Sherwood J. Reese, OSB #144130 Of Drew L. Johnson, P.C. Attorneys for Plaintiff

2 — ORDER FOR ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO EAJA

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James v. Commissioner Social Security Administration, (D. Or. 2022).

James v. Commissioner Social Security Administration (James v. Commissioner Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Astrue v. Ratliff
560 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 2010)