James v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon·Decided August 19, 2021·No. 3:19-cv-01109·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

FRANKIE J.1,

Petitioner, Civ. No. 3:19-cv-01109-CL

v. ORDER

ANDREW SAUL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant. _____________________________

MCSHANE, Judge: Magistrate Judge Mark Clarke filed a Findings and Recommendation (#14), and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. Although neither party filed objections, I reviewed the legal principles de novo. United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1445 (9th Cir. 1998). I find no error and conclude the report is correct. Magistrate Judge Clarke’s Findings and Recommendation (#14) is adopted. The Commissioner’s final decision is affirmed. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 18th day of August, 2021. _______/s/ Michael J. McShane________ Michael McShane United States District Judge

1 In the interest of privacy, this opinion uses only the first name and the initial of the last name of the non- governmental party in this case. 1 – ORDER

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James v. Commissioner Social Security Administration, (D. Or. 2021).

James v. Commissioner Social Security Administration (James v. Commissioner Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related