James v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
FRANKIE J.1,
Petitioner, Civ. No. 3:19-cv-01109-CL
v. ORDER
ANDREW SAUL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant. _____________________________
MCSHANE, Judge: Magistrate Judge Mark Clarke filed a Findings and Recommendation (#14), and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. Although neither party filed objections, I reviewed the legal principles de novo. United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1445 (9th Cir. 1998). I find no error and conclude the report is correct. Magistrate Judge Clarke’s Findings and Recommendation (#14) is adopted. The Commissioner’s final decision is affirmed. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 18th day of August, 2021. _______/s/ Michael J. McShane________ Michael McShane United States District Judge
1 In the interest of privacy, this opinion uses only the first name and the initial of the last name of the non- governmental party in this case. 1 – ORDER
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
James v. Commissioner Social Security Administration (James v. Commissioner Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.