James v. AT Still University

Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

9 Jana James, No. CV-23-00231-PHX-DLR

10 Plaintiff, ORDER

11 v.

12 AT Still University,

13 Defendant. 14 15 16 Plaintiff Jana James is self-represented. She has sued Defendant AT Still 17 University for allegedly violating the Americans with Disabilities Act by refusing to 18 accommodate Ms. James’ disability during her time as a student. (Doc. 9.) Ms. James has 19 filed a motion requesting that the Court appoint her counsel in advance of the October 12, 20 2023, case management conference. (Doc. 22.) Ms. James’ motion will be denied. 21 Generally, there is no constitutional right to appointment of counsel in a civil case. 22 Johnson v. U.S. Dep’t of Treasury, 939 F.2d 820, 824 (9th Cir. 1991). The Court has 23 discretion, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1), to appoint counsel to represent civil 24 litigants who cannot afford counsel. However, appointment of counsel is appropriate only 25 when “exceptional circumstances” are present. Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 26 (9th Cir. 1991) (citing Wilborn v. Escalderon, 789 F.2d 1328, 1331 (9th Cir. 1986)). 27 Here, the Court does not find exceptional circumstances warranting appointment 28 of counsel. Ms. James explains in her motion that she has reached out to several attorneys on the Arizona State Bar website, but thus far has been unable to find counsel at a rate 2|| she can afford. Ms. James says she is still searching for an attorney, but in the meantime, || requests appointed counsel because she does not feel prepared to meet with opposing counsel to craft a proposed scheduling order given her unfamiliarity with the Court’s 5 || procedures. 6 Ms. James’ circumstances are not extraordinary. Many, if not most, self- 7\|| represented litigants are unfamiliar with federal procedure and at times find federal civil 8 || litigation overwhelming. But the Court has resources available to self-represented 9|| litigants to help them better understand the process. The Court issued a notice to Ms. || James on February 6, 2023, detailing these resources. (Doc. 6.) Many are available online 11 || at the Court’s public website, www.azd.uscourts.gov. In the upper right corner of the homepage, Ms. James will find a link titled “For those Proceeding Without an Attorney.” 13 || If she follows it, she will find links to, among other resources, the Court’s “Handbook for Self-Represented Litigants,” and the Advice-Only Clinic, where she can schedule an 15 || appointment to speak with a volunteer attorney. The Court encourages Ms. James to avail 16|| herself of these resources. 17 IT IS ORDERED that Ms. James’ motion to appoint counsel (Doc. 22) is 18 |} DENIED. 19 Dated this 29th day of August, 2023. 20 - 21 Mi Ver 22 Do . Rayes 33 United States District Judge 24 25 26 27 28

_2-