James v. Alderton Dock Yards, Ltd.
232 A.D. 698
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in James v. Alderton Dock Yards, Ltd.. Read the opinion of the Court — 225 A.D. 675 →
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Kapper, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents, being of opinion that this is not a case for a declaratory judgment, and, furthermore, plaintiff was not entitled to a hen, nor to an injunction, nor to a judgment with a right to execution.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
James v. Alderton Dock Yards, Ltd., 232 A.D. 698 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).
232 A.D. 698 (James v. Alderton Dock Yards, Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.