James v. Alderton Dock Yards, Ltd.

232 A.D. 698

This text of 232 A.D. 698 (James v. Alderton Dock Yards, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James v. Alderton Dock Yards, Ltd., 232 A.D. 698 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Kapper, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents, being of opinion that this is not a case for a declaratory judgment, and, furthermore, plaintiff was not entitled to a hen, nor to an injunction, nor to a judgment with a right to execution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
232 A.D. 698, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-alderton-dock-yards-ltd-nyappdiv-1931.