James v. Alderton Dock Yards, Ltd.
228 A.D. 720
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in James v. Alderton Dock Yards, Ltd.. Read the opinion of the Court — 225 A.D. 675 →
Opinion
— ■ Order denying motion to dismiss complaint for insufficiency affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to defendant to answer within twenty days from service of a copy of the order herein upon payment of such costs. No opinion. Rich, Young, Kapper and Carswell, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents, being of opinion that this is not a case for a declaratory judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
James v. Alderton Dock Yards, Ltd., 228 A.D. 720 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).
228 A.D. 720 (James v. Alderton Dock Yards, Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.