James Stanley Pipes v. United States

402 F.2d 271
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedNovember 1, 1968
Docket24965_1
StatusPublished

This text of 402 F.2d 271 (James Stanley Pipes v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James Stanley Pipes v. United States, 402 F.2d 271 (5th Cir. 1968).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The Petition for Rehearing is denied and no member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc (Rule 35 Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12), the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is denied. (See opinion at 5 Cir., 399 F.2d 471).

GODBOLD, Circuit Judge:

I concurred in the result of this case, therefore I concur in the denial of the petition for rehearing. In so doing I do not recede from, but reiterate, the views already expressed in my separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

James Stanley Pipes v. United States
399 F.2d 471 (Fifth Circuit, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
402 F.2d 271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-stanley-pipes-v-united-states-ca5-1968.