James S.D. Holt v. Centurion Health, et al.
This text of James S.D. Holt v. Centurion Health, et al. (James S.D. Holt v. Centurion Health, et al.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Indiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA TERRE HAUTE DIVISION
JAMES S.D. HOLT, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 2:26-cv-00044-JRO-MG ) CENTURION HEALTH, et al., ) ) Defendants. )
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION AND DIRECTING ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT
The Court reviewed the complaint filed by plaintiff, James S.D. Holt, and ordered him to show cause why the action should not be dismissed because his complaint could not proceed as presented. Dkt. 7. Mr. Holt has filed his response. Dkt. 9. In his complaint, Mr. Holt seeks to proceed on behalf of the estate of his father, Roger Nicholson. Dkt. 1. Mr. Holt’s response argues that he is the “sole living heir” to his father’s estate, and the only living beneficiary. Dkt. 9. The Court also instructed Mr. Holt that if he was the sole beneficiary, his response should address whether he is able to represent the estate pro se. Dkt. 7 at 2. Mr. Holt has not addressed this in his response. Dkt. 9. Mr. Holt has not claimed to be the executor or administrator of his estate. Only the executor or administrator of an estate has standing to sue on its behalf. Mr. Holt did not allege that he is either, or that an open estate even exists. Even if he is the only beneficiary, it does not give him standing to sue on behalf of the estate’s interests. See Hunter v. Pepsico, Inc., 631 F. App’x 445, 446 (7th Cir. 2015) (applying the relevant State law for Illinois and New York that beneficiaries /heirs/next of kin have no standing to sue on behalf of the estate). In Indiana, a beneficiary or heir has no independent cause of action without opening an estate, as such authority to bring lawsuits is vested with the personal representative of an estate. See Inlow v. Henderson, Daily, Withrow & Devoe, 787 N.E.2d 385 (Ind. Ct. App. 2003) (heirs may not maintain a suit independent of the personal representative and without probate court authority); Ind. Code § 29-1-13-3 (personal representative has full power to maintain any suit); Ind. Code § 34-23-1-1 (personal representative must commence an action for wrongful death). Rather, “a personal representative of an estate is regarded as a trustee appointed by law for the benefit of and the protection of creditors and distributees of that estate.” Ind. Code § 29-1-1-3; In re Bender, 844 N.E.2d 170, 178 (Ind. Ct. App. 2006), reh’g denied, trans. denied. This case cannot proceed as presented. Mr. Holt cannot represent the interests of another as a non-attorney. 28 U.S.C. § 1654; Rhodes v. Jeffersonville Bldg. Comm’r, No. 4:24-CV-00055-TWP-KMB, 2024 WL 2722878, at *2 (S.D. Ind. May 28, 2024). Therefore, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. Final judgment shall now issue. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 3/30/2026
J n R. Olson United States District Judge Southern District of Indiana
Distribution:
JAMES S.D. HOLT 239390 BRANCHVILLE - CF BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY Inmate Mail/Parcels 21390 Old State Road 37 BRANCHVILLE, IN 47514
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
James S.D. Holt v. Centurion Health, et al., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-sd-holt-v-centurion-health-et-al-insd-2026.