Home/Fourth Circuit/James River and Kanawha Canal Parks, Inc. v. Richmond Metropolitan Authority

James River and Kanawha Canal Parks, Inc. v. Richmond Metropolitan Authority

481 F.2d 1280
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 17, 1973
Docket73-1841
StatusPublished
Cited by23 cases

This text of 481 F.2d 1280 (James River and Kanawha Canal Parks, Inc. v. Richmond Metropolitan Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James River and Kanawha Canal Parks, Inc. v. Richmond Metropolitan Authority, 481 F.2d 1280 (4th Cir. 1973).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Noting that no question concerning the standing of the parties or the jurisdiction of the court has been raised on appeal, we affirm on the opinion of the district court, 359 F.Supp. 611 (E.D.Va. 1973).

In the event a petition for certiorari be filed more than thirty days after the date of filing of this opinion, plaintiff is required to give bond with sufficient corporate surety, to be approved by the Clerk of this court, in the sum of $500,000, to hold the defendants, any or all of them, harmless on account of any increase in project construction costs or increase in interest rates on bonds sold to finance the project, either or both, which may occur because of delay occasioned on account of the filing of such petition for certiorari should the judgment of this court be affirmed.

Let the mandate of the court issue forthwith.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Benton Franklin Riverfront Trailway & Bridge Committee v. Lewis
529 F. Supp. 101 (E.D. Washington, 1981)
College Gardens Civic Ass'n v. U. S. Department of Transportation
522 F. Supp. 377 (D. Maryland, 1981)
Carlos Romero-Barcelo, Etc. v. Harold Brown
643 F.2d 835 (First Circuit, 1981)
In Re Complaint of Marine Navigation Sulphur Carriers, Inc.
507 F. Supp. 205 (E.D. Virginia, 1980)
Wisconsin's Environmental Decade, Inc. v. Department of Natural Resources
288 N.W.2d 168 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 1979)
Sierra Club v. Andrus
610 F.2d 581 (Ninth Circuit, 1979)
United States v. City of Irving
482 F. Supp. 393 (N.D. Texas, 1979)
Committee for Auto Responsibility v. Solomon
603 F.2d 992 (D.C. Circuit, 1979)
Township of Long Beach v. City of New York
445 F. Supp. 1203 (D. New Jersey, 1978)
National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Wilmington Medical Center, Inc.
436 F. Supp. 1194 (D. Delaware, 1977)
Estinghouse Electric Corp. v. Schlesinger
542 F.2d 1190 (Fourth Circuit, 1976)
Patterson v. Exon
415 F. Supp. 1276 (D. Nebraska, 1976)
Scottsdale Mall v. State of Indiana
418 F. Supp. 296 (S.D. Indiana, 1976)
Sierra Club v. Morton
400 F. Supp. 610 (N.D. California, 1975)
The City of Highland Park, Illinois, Etc. v. Russell E. Train, Etc., the City of Highland Park, Illinois, Etc. v. Russell E. Train, as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, and United States Environmental Protection Agency
519 F.2d 681 (Seventh Circuit, 1975)
Hill v. Coleman
399 F. Supp. 194 (D. Delaware, 1975)
City of Highland Park v. Train
519 F.2d 681 (Seventh Circuit, 1975)
Potomac River Ass'n v. Lundeberg Maryland Seamanship School, Inc.
402 F. Supp. 344 (D. Maryland, 1975)
Appalachian Mountain Club v. Brinegar
394 F. Supp. 105 (D. New Hampshire, 1975)
Save the Courthouse Committee v. Lynn
408 F. Supp. 1323 (S.D. New York, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
481 F.2d 1280, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-river-and-kanawha-canal-parks-inc-v-richmond-metropolitan-ca4-1973.