James Price v. Godiva Chocolatier, Inc.
This text of 939 F.3d 1278 (James Price v. Godiva Chocolatier, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 16-16486 Date Filed: 10/04/2019 Page: 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________
No. 16-16486 ________________________
D.C. Docket No. 0:15-cv-60716-WPD
DR. DAVID S. MURANSKY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff - Appellee,
JAMES H. PRICE, ERIC ALAN ISAACSON, Interested Parties - Appellants,
versus
GODIVA CHOCOLATIER, INC., a New Jersey corporation,
Defendant - Appellee.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida ________________________
Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, MARCUS, WILSON, WILLIAM PRYOR, MARTIN, JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, NEWSOM, BRANCH, and GRANT, Circuit Judges*:
* Judge Jill Pryor, having recused herself, did not participate in the poll. Case: 16-16486 Date Filed: 10/04/2019 Page: 2 of 2
A petition for rehearing en banc having been filed, a member of this Court in
active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard en
banc, and a majority of the judges of this Court in active service having voted in
favor of granting rehearing en banc, it is ORDERED that this case will be reheard
en banc. The panel’s opinion is VACATED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
939 F.3d 1278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-price-v-godiva-chocolatier-inc-ca11-2019.