Krukas v. Aarp
This text of Krukas v. Aarp (Krukas v. Aarp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
HELEN KRUKAS, et al.,
Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 18-1124 (BAH) v. Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell AARP, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
Upon consideration of defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 95,
plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification, ECF No. 56, the memoranda submitted in support and
opposition, and the entire record herein, for the reasons stated in the accompanying
Memorandum Opinion issued contemporaneously with this Order, it is hereby
ORDERED that defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 95, is
GRANTED; it is further
ORDERED that this case is dismissed for lack of standing; it is further
ORDERED that plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification, ECF No. 56, is DENIED AS
MOOT, in light of the dismissal of this case; and it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall close this case.
SO ORDERED.
This is a final and appealable Order.
Date: November 2, 2021
__________________________ BERYL A. HOWELL Chief Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Krukas v. Aarp, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/krukas-v-aarp-dcd-2021.