James L. Cobb v. Chevron U. S. A., Inc.
This text of 558 F.2d 236 (James L. Cobb v. Chevron U. S. A., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff appeals the denial by the district court of a jury trial on his Age Discrimination Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq., claim against Chevron. Chevron has moved to dismiss the appeal.
Because the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a) and (b) have not been met, this issue is not cognizable on appeal. 1
The appeal is DISMISSED.
. For treatment of this issue when presented as a writ of mandamus see Dairy Queen, Inc. v. Wood, 369 U.S. 469, 82 S.Ct. 894, 8 L.Ed.2d 44 (1962); Moore’s Fed.Prac. Vol. 9, ¶ 110.20[4].
It appears that the issue raised by this appeal was submitted for decision to a panel of this court on April 20, 1977, in Murphy v. American Motors Sales Corp. (No. 76-2718).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
558 F.2d 236, 15 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 604, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-l-cobb-v-chevron-u-s-a-inc-ca5-1977.