James Kenneth Julian v. United States

391 F.2d 279, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7932
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 28, 1968
Docket21790_1
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 391 F.2d 279 (James Kenneth Julian v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James Kenneth Julian v. United States, 391 F.2d 279, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7932 (9th Cir. 1968).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction is reversed.

Julian was found asleep in Las Vegas, Nevada, in a car that had recently been stolen in Texas. He was convicted under the Dyer Act, interstate transportation of stolen property.

If Julian clearly had possession, well established applicable presumptions would operate to justify the conviction.

The checkbook and savings passbook of the last lawful possessor in Texas of the car, an officer of the corporation which owned the car, were found in Julian’s pocket. The owner had left these in the car. The conclusion from that, that Julian had possession of the car *280 is not unreasonable. Perhaps it would satisfy a preponderance test. But where convicting presumptions * are projected on possession, the evidence of possession ought to be very clear to satisfy the test of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Slight additional proof might be enough, but wé do not have it.

If the government can produce further evidence for a new trial, it should have the opportunity. The prosecutor should promptly advise the district court whether it can produce further evidence to sustain the indictment. If it can not, the indictment should be dismissed. On a new trial, there should be a little more complete instructions on possession.

*

Morandy v. United States, 9 Cir., 170 F.2d 5; Jones v. United States, 9 Cir., 378 F.2d 340.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Arthur Joseph Mayer
441 F.2d 322 (Ninth Circuit, 1971)
United States v. Jeffery William Rhodes
433 F.2d 1307 (Eighth Circuit, 1970)
United States v. Littleton Fred Capps
421 F.2d 1341 (Ninth Circuit, 1970)
United States v. Robert Leo Robertson, Jr.
417 F.2d 873 (Fifth Circuit, 1969)
United States v. Antonio Cepeda Cabrera
417 F.2d 211 (Fifth Circuit, 1969)
Martti Quetzi Ruona v. United States
403 F.2d 215 (Ninth Circuit, 1968)
Ronald James Lawrence v. United States
400 F.2d 624 (Ninth Circuit, 1968)
Alvin Eugene Baker v. United States
395 F.2d 368 (Eighth Circuit, 1968)
Leroy L. Early v. United States
394 F.2d 117 (Tenth Circuit, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
391 F.2d 279, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7932, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-kenneth-julian-v-united-states-ca9-1968.