James H. Dunn v. C. Murray Henderson, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Respondent- No. 71-2175 Summary Calendar. (1) Rule 18, 5 Cir., Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York, 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I

446 F.2d 1398
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedAugust 19, 1971
Docket1398
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 446 F.2d 1398 (James H. Dunn v. C. Murray Henderson, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Respondent- No. 71-2175 Summary Calendar. (1) Rule 18, 5 Cir., Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York, 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James H. Dunn v. C. Murray Henderson, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Respondent- No. 71-2175 Summary Calendar. (1) Rule 18, 5 Cir., Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York, 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I, 446 F.2d 1398 (5th Cir. 1971).

Opinion

446 F.2d 1398

James H. DUNN, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary,
Respondent- Appellee.
No. 71-2175 Summary Calendar.*
*(1) Rule 18, 5 Cir., Isbell Enterprises, Inc.
v.
Citizens Casualty Company of New York et al., 5 Cir. 1970,
431 F.2d 409, Part I.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 19, 1971.

James Dunn, pro se.

Jack P. F. Gremillion, Atty. Gen. of La., Baton Rouge, La., for respondent-appellee.

Before, BELL, AINSWORTH and GODBOLD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Dunn appeals the district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus, 312 F.Supp. 1370. Although the court's order was entered on May 15, 1970, the appellant did not file a notice of appeal or any document which might reasonably be construed as such until the March 3, 1971 filing of his motion for a certificate of probable cause. The motion was granted on the same date by the district court.

Since the appellant failed to file a notice of appeal until almost eight months beyond the maximum extended time period provided in Rule 4(a), F.R.A.P., the district court had no authority to issue a certificate of probable cause. This Court therefore has no jurisdiction to adjudicate the appeal. Bean v. Wainwright, 5th Cir. 1971, 437 F.2d 112; Lawrence v. Wainwright, 5th Cir. 1969, 419 F.2d 1326, cert. denied 1970, 397 U.S. 1029, 90 S.Ct. 1281, 25 L.Ed.2d 542; Allen v. Wainwright, 5th Cir. 1967, 384 F.2d 745.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sylvester Tribbitt v. Louie L. Wainwright
462 F.2d 600 (Fifth Circuit, 1972)
Hardy Jackson v. Sheriff Bill Decker
451 F.2d 348 (Fifth Circuit, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
446 F.2d 1398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-h-dunn-v-c-murray-henderson-warden-louisiana-state-penitentiary-ca5-1971.