James Edward Grumbles v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 2, 2013·No. 05-13-00369-CR·Published

Opinion

Order entered July 2, 2013

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00369-CR

JAMES EDWARD GRUMBLES, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F11-70745-Y

ORDER The Court DENIES appellant’s June 18, 2013 pro se motion for reasonable bail pending

appeal. This is not the proper Court in which to file a motion regarding a bond pending appeal.

See TEX. CODE CRIM. P. ANN. art. 44.04(d). Moreover, appellant is represented by counsel and is

not entitled to hybrid representation. See Rudd v. State, 616 S.W.2d 623 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel

Op.] 1981).

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James Edward Grumbles v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

James Edward Grumbles v. State (James Edward Grumbles v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rudd v. State
616 S.W.2d 623 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1981)