James Edward Grumbles v. State
This text of James Edward Grumbles v. State (James Edward Grumbles v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order entered July 2, 2013
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00369-CR
JAMES EDWARD GRUMBLES, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F11-70745-Y
ORDER The Court DENIES appellant’s June 18, 2013 pro se motion for reasonable bail pending
appeal. This is not the proper Court in which to file a motion regarding a bond pending appeal.
See TEX. CODE CRIM. P. ANN. art. 44.04(d). Moreover, appellant is represented by counsel and is
not entitled to hybrid representation. See Rudd v. State, 616 S.W.2d 623 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel
Op.] 1981).
/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
James Edward Grumbles v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-edward-grumbles-v-state-texapp-2013.