James Clinton Coyle v. Coyle Family Farm, Inc.
Opinion
ACCEPTED 04-16-00133-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 8/31/2016 2:11:03 PM KEITH HOTTLE CLERK
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS JAMES CLINTON COYLE, § 08/31/2016 2:11:03 PM Appellant, § KEITH E. HOTTLE § Clerk VS. § NO. 04-16-00133-CV § COYLE FAMILY FARM, INC., § Appellee. §
ON APPEAL FROM CAUSE NO. 3208 COUNTY COURT AT LAW, MEDINA COUNTY, TEXAS HONORABLE VIVIAN TORRES, JUDGE PRESIDING
APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE APPELLANT’S SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF WITH BRIEF ATTACHED
ANTON E. HACKEBEIL State Bar No. 08667150 P.O. Box 220 Hondo, Texas 78861 Tel: (830) 741-7001 Fax: (866) 743-4537 Email: tonyhackebeil@att.net ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE COURT OF APPEALS:
COMES NOW Appellant, James Clinton Coyle, by and through the
undersigned counsel and files this Motion for Leave to File Appellant’s
Supplemental Brief with Brief Attached, and would show the court the following:
Counsel for Appellant would show that counsel failed to include in
Appellant’s Brief an argument critical to sustain Appellant’s plea to this court that
is contained in the Mediated Settlement Agreement (“MSA”) referred to in and
attached to Appellant’s Brief which Appellant’s counsel believes could eliminate the
need for argument on other points in Appellant’s Brief but without abandoning
Appellant’s original Brief.
Appellant’s Supplemental Brief is attached to this motion and is short and
concise in identifying a provision in the MSA that Appellant’s counsel believes
should eliminate the need for additional arguments and reliance on legal theories
since the very document upon which Appellee relies for its requested relief precludes
Appellee from pursuing any action with regard to a dispute of terms of the MSA in
any forum except the District Court of the 38th Judicial District.
Wherefore, premises considered, Appellant prays that this court grant his
Motion for Leave to file Appellant’s Supplemental Brief and accept Appellant’s
Brief as attached to this Motion.
2 Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Anton E. Hackebeil ANTON E. HACKEBEIL State Bar No. 08667150 P.O. Box 220 Hondo, Texas 78861 Tel: (830) 741-7001 Fax: (866) 743-4537 Email: tonyhackebeil@att.net ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
I certify that this document complies with the typeface requirements of Tex.
R. App. P. 9.4(e) because it has been prepared in a conventional typeface no smaller
than 14-point font for text, 12-point for footnotes. I also certify that this document
contains approximately 440 words.
/s/ Anton E. Hackebeil Anton E. Hackebeil
3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
This is to certify that on August 31, 2016, a true and correct copy of
Appellant’s Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Brief with Brief Attached was
served on John C. Chunn, attorney for Appellee, P.O. Box 396, Hondo, Texas 78861,
by electronic filing manager.
/s/ Anton E. Hackebeil Anton E. Hackebeil Counsel for Appellant
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
James Clinton Coyle v. Coyle Family Farm, Inc. (James Clinton Coyle v. Coyle Family Farm, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.