James Clinton Coyle v. Coyle Family Farm, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 6, 2016·No. 04-16-00133-CV·Published

Opinion

ACCEPTED

04-16-00133-CV

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

6/6/2016 3:51:47 PM

KEITH HOTTLE

CLERK

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

JAMES CLINTON COYLE, § 06/6/2016 3:51:47 PM Appellant, § KEITH E. HOTTLE § Clerk VS. § NO. 04-16-00133-CV §

COYLE FAMILY FARM, INC., § Appellee. §

ON APPEAL FROM

CAUSE NO. 3208

COUNTY COURT AT LAW,

MEDINA COUNTY, TEXAS

HONORABLE VIVIAN TORRES, JUDGE PRESIDING

APPELLANT’S FIRST UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPELLANT’S BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS:

Pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1 and 38.6(d), the Appellant, James Clinton Coyle (“Appellant”) files this Unopposed First Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellant’s Brief.

Appellant’s brief is currently due on June 9, 2016.

Counsel for Appellant requests a 60-day extension of time to file the opening brief.

Counsel for Appellant relies on the following reasons, in addition to the routine matters that counsel must attend to in daily practice, to explain the need for the requested extension:

 Counsel for Appellant has a pre-planned vacation scheduled for the month of June.

Counsel for Appellant seeks this extension of time to be able to prepare an effective and concise brief to aid this Court in its analysis of the issues presented. This request is not sought for delay but so that justice may be done.

The undersigned counsel has conferred with opposing counsel and he has indicated that his client does not oppose this motion.

All facts recited in this motion are within the personal knowledge of the counsel signing this motion, therefore no verification is necessary under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 10.2.

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

For the reasons set forth above, Appellant requests that this Court grant this Unopposed First Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellant’s Brief. Appellant requests all other relief to which he may be entitled.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Anton E. Hackebeil

ANTON E. HACKEBEIL

State Bar No. 08667150

P.O. Box 220

Hondo, Texas 78861

Tel: (830) 741-7001

Fax: (866) 743-4537

Email: tonyhackebeil@att.net ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE I certify that on June 6, 2016, I conferred with counsel for Appellee regarding this motion and Appellee is not opposed to this motion.

/s/ Anton E. Hackebeil

Anton E. Hackebeil

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that on June 6, 2016, a true and correct copy of Appellant’s First Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellant’s Brief was served on counsel for Appellee by the eFileTexas.gov efiling system.

/s/ Anton E. Hackebeil

Anton E. Hackebeil

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE I certify that this document complies with the typeface requirements of Tex.

R. App. P. 9.4(e) because it has been prepared in a conventional typeface no smaller than 14-point font for text. I also certify that this document contains 245 words, excluding any parts exempted by Tex. R. App. P. 9.4(i)(1).

/s/ Anton E. Hackebeil

Anton E. Hackebeil

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James Clinton Coyle v. Coyle Family Farm, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

James Clinton Coyle v. Coyle Family Farm, Inc. (James Clinton Coyle v. Coyle Family Farm, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.