James Clay v. Warden

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 24-10623 Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

JAMES RASHAD CLAY, Petitioner-Appellant, versus WARDEN,

Respondent-Appellee.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 1:23-cv-02971-SEG

____________________

2

2 Opinion of the Court 24-10623

Before JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, and LUCK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdiction . James Clay, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals from the magistrate judge’s final report and recommendation (“R&R”) that his habeas petition be denied. We lack jurisdiction to review the R&R because it has not been rendered final by the district court. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; Donovan v. Sarasota Concrete Co., 693 F.2d 1061, 1066-67 (11th Cir. 1982); Perez-Priego v. Alachua Cnty. Clerk of Ct., 148 F.3d 1272, 1273 (11th Cir. 1998).

No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.