James Bracamonte v. United States

Ninth Circuit

James Bracamonte v. United States

345 F.2d 791, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5515

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMay 20, 1965

Docket19611

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 345 F.2d 791 (James Bracamonte v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James Bracamonte v. United States, 345 F.2d 791, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5515 (9th Cir. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The district court did not err in denying the motion of James Bracamonte, made under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1958), to vacate the sentence imposed upon him on April 13, 1962, following his conviction on a plea of guilty, to two counts of an indictment charging violations of 18 U. S.C. § 495 (1958), forging a United States Treasury check.

Upon the appeal from the order denying that motion we therefore

Affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The district court did not err in denying the motion of James Bracamonte, made under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1958), to vacate the sentence imposed upon him on April 13, 1962, following his conviction on a plea of guilty, to two counts of an indictment charging violations of 18 U. S.C. § 495 (1958), forging a United States Treasury check.

Upon the appeal from the order denying that motion we therefore

Affirm.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

345 F.2d 791, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-bracamonte-v-united-states-ca9-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack