James A. Klein Enterprises, Inc. v. Braatz
This text of 51 A.D.2d 1021 (James A. Klein Enterprises, Inc. v. Braatz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia , to compel the issuance of a building permit, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated November 6, 1974 and entered in Putnam County, which, after a hearing, inter alia, directed the issuance of a building permit. Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, and proceeding remanded to Special Term for consideration of the eifect, if any, of a new zoning provision (Local Laws, 1974, No. 1 of Village of Cold Spring), introduced for consideration for the first time on appeal, on petitioner’s application for site plan approval, and for the entry [1022]*1022of a new judgment. Although an appellate court is ordinarily bound by the zoning law in effect at the time the appeal is decided (Matter of Fairchild Sons v Rogers, 266 NY 460; Matter of Dengeles .v Young, 3 AD2d 758), village officials may not, in bad faith, delay approval of a properly submitted and conforming building plan while they alter an ordinance to bar the prospective development (Matter of Dubow v Ross, 254 App Div 706). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Hargett, Damiani and Christ, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
51 A.D.2d 1021, 381 N.Y.S.2d 304, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11802, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-a-klein-enterprises-inc-v-braatz-nyappdiv-1976.