Dengeles v. Young

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dengeles v. Young

3 A.D.2d 758, 160 N.Y.S.2d 83, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6274

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 11, 1957

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 3 A.D.2d 758 (Dengeles v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dengeles v. Young, 3 A.D.2d 758, 160 N.Y.S.2d 83, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6274 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding to direct the chief building inspector of the Town of Hempstead to issue a building permit, the appeal is from an order directing issuance of the permit forthwith. Order reversed, without costs, and proceeding dismissed, -without costs, and without prejudice to any action or proceeding which respondents might be advised to institute, based on the grounds that appellant -willfully refused to grant the permit, and misled and hindered respondents (see Matter of Dubow v. Boss, 254 App. Div. 706). Respondents were entitled to issuance of the permit by the building inspector as a matter of right when they applied for it and also at the time of entry of the order appealed from. The order appealed from was therefore proper when made. However, the right to a permit did not vest, and this appeal must be decided upon the law as it now exists (Matter of Boardwalk & Seashore Gorp. v. Murdock, 286 N. Y. 494). The building zone ordinance, as amended since the entry of the order appealed from, prohibits the issuance of the permit applied for without application to the board of appeals, which is not a party to this proceeding. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur. [1 Misc 2d 692.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding to direct the chief building inspector of the Town of Hempstead to issue a building permit, the appeal is from an order directing issuance of the permit forthwith. Order reversed, without costs, and proceeding dismissed, -without costs, and without prejudice to any action or proceeding which respondents might be advised to institute, based on the grounds that appellant -willfully refused to grant the permit, and misled and hindered respondents (see Matter of Dubow v. Boss, 254 App. Div. 706). Respondents were entitled to issuance of the permit by the building inspector as a matter of right when they applied for it and also at the time of entry of the order appealed from. The order appealed from was therefore proper when made. However, the right to a permit did not vest, and this appeal must be decided upon the law as it now exists (Matter of Boardwalk & Seashore Gorp. v. Murdock, 286 N. Y. 494). The building zone ordinance, as amended since the entry of the order appealed from, prohibits the issuance of the permit applied for without application to the board of appeals, which is not a party to this proceeding. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur. [1 Misc 2d 692.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 A.D.2d 758, 160 N.Y.S.2d 83, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6274, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dengeles-v-young-nyappdiv-1957.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack