Jamein Rakin Randolph v. Ramona L. Goodman

S.D. New York

Jamein Rakin Randolph v. Ramona L. Goodman

DecidedSeptember 26, 2025

Docket1:25-cv-04833

StatusUnknown

This text of Jamein Rakin Randolph v. Ramona L. Goodman (Jamein Rakin Randolph v. Ramona L. Goodman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jamein Rakin Randolph v. Ramona L. Goodman, (S.D.N.Y. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JAMEIN RAKIN RANDOLPH, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:25-cv-04833 (JLR) -against- ORDER RAMONA L. GOODMAN, Defendant.

JENNIFER L. ROCHON, United States District Judge: The Court previously dismissed the Complaint with leave to file an amended complaint by September 19, 2025, and warned Plaintiff that if he failed to submit an amended complaint by that date, judgment would be entered in favor of Defendant and the case would be closed. Dkt. 7. That date has now passed without Plaintiff filing an amended complaint. In light of Plaintiff's pro se status, however, the Court will permit Plaintiff an additional two weeks to submit an amended complaint. If Plaintiff does not submit an amended complaint by October 10, 2025, the Clerk of Court will direct that judgment be entered in favor of Defendant and that the case be closed. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail this Order to Plaintiff at the address listed on the docket. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Dated: September 26, 2025 New York, New York SO ORDERED. hace L. ROCHON United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JAMEIN RAKIN RANDOLPH, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:25-cv-04833 (JLR) -against- ORDER RAMONA L. GOODMAN, Defendant.

JENNIFER L. ROCHON, United States District Judge: The Court previously dismissed the Complaint with leave to file an amended complaint by September 19, 2025, and warned Plaintiff that if he failed to submit an amended complaint by that date, judgment would be entered in favor of Defendant and the case would be closed. Dkt. 7. That date has now passed without Plaintiff filing an amended complaint. In light of Plaintiff's pro se status, however, the Court will permit Plaintiff an additional two weeks to submit an amended complaint. If Plaintiff does not submit an amended complaint by October 10, 2025, the Clerk of Court will direct that judgment be entered in favor of Defendant and that the case be closed. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail this Order to Plaintiff at the address listed on the docket. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Dated: September 26, 2025 New York, New York SO ORDERED. hace L. ROCHON United States District Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Jamein Rakin Randolph v. Ramona L. Goodman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jamein-rakin-randolph-v-ramona-l-goodman-nysd-2025.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack