Jamal Harper v. Georgia Department of Human Services

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Jamal Harper v. Georgia Department of Human Services

DecidedOctober 22, 2024

DocketA25A0366

StatusPublished

This text of Jamal Harper v. Georgia Department of Human Services (Jamal Harper v. Georgia Department of Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jamal Harper v. Georgia Department of Human Services, (Ga. Ct. App. 2024).

Pincite

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ October 22, 2024

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A25A0366. JAMAL HARPER v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES.

Jamal Harper filed this direct appeal from the trial court’s order finding him in contempt for failure to pay child support. We, however, lack jurisdiction. “Appeals from judgments or orders in divorce, alimony, and other domestic relations cases, including . . . holding or declining to hold persons in contempt” must be made by filing an application for discretionary review. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (2), (b). Where the issue on appeal is child support, the case is a domestic relations case within the meaning of the statute. See Booker v. Ga. Dept. of Human Resources, 317 Ga. App. 426, 427 (731 SE2d 110) (2012) (an action in which the “underlying subject matter is [the] obligation to provide child support” is “a domestic relations case subject to review only by application”); see also Russo v. Manning, 252 Ga. 155, 156 (312 SE2d 319) (1984) (“A judgment of contempt regarding a domestic relations decree is appealable only by application for discretionary appeal.”). “Compliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is jurisdictional.” Smoak v. Dept. of Human Resources, 221 Ga. App. 257, 257 (471 SE2d 60) (1996). Harper’s failure to follow the discretionary appeal procedure deprives us of jurisdiction over this direct appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 10/22/2024 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ October 22, 2024

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A25A0366. JAMAL HARPER v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES.

Jamal Harper filed this direct appeal from the trial court’s order finding him in contempt for failure to pay child support. We, however, lack jurisdiction. “Appeals from judgments or orders in divorce, alimony, and other domestic relations cases, including . . . holding or declining to hold persons in contempt” must be made by filing an application for discretionary review. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (2), (b). Where the issue on appeal is child support, the case is a domestic relations case within the meaning of the statute. See Booker v. Ga. Dept. of Human Resources, 317 Ga. App. 426, 427 (731 SE2d 110) (2012) (an action in which the “underlying subject matter is [the] obligation to provide child support” is “a domestic relations case subject to review only by application”); see also Russo v. Manning, 252 Ga. 155, 156 (312 SE2d 319) (1984) (“A judgment of contempt regarding a domestic relations decree is appealable only by application for discretionary appeal.”). “Compliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is jurisdictional.” Smoak v. Dept. of Human Resources, 221 Ga. App. 257, 257 (471 SE2d 60) (1996). Harper’s failure to follow the discretionary appeal procedure deprives us of jurisdiction over this direct appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 10/22/2024 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Jamal Harper v. Georgia Department of Human Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jamal-harper-v-georgia-department-of-human-services-gactapp-2024.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack