Jamaica Pond Garage, Inc. v. Woodside Motor Livery, Inc.

236 Mass. 541
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided December 9, 1920·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

An issue of fact in the trial court was the price agreed between the parties for motor vehicle hire. One Wolf-[542] son, agent of the plaintiff, testified that in telephone conversation with one Woodside, representing the defendant, $4 per hour was stipulated between them, while Woodside testified that the price was $3.50 per hour. A witness, having testified that he was present when Wolfson said he was telephoning with Woodside, then was permitted to testify that at that time he heard Wolfson say into the telephone “four dollars an hour is all right.” In this, there was no error of law. It was not hearsay evidence. It tended to confirm the testimony of Wolfson in part. Its weight depended upon the finding whether Wolfson’s testimony to the effect that Woodside was at the other end of the telephone during that conversation was true; but that was wholly a question of fact. See Commonwealth v. Wakelin, 230 Mass. 567, 574, 575.

Order dismissing report affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jamaica Pond Garage, Inc. v. Woodside Motor Livery, Inc., 236 Mass. 541 (Mass. 1920).

236 Mass. 541 (Jamaica Pond Garage, Inc. v. Woodside Motor Livery, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shimer v. Foley, Hoag & Eliot LLP
795 N.E.2d 599 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 2003)
DiBenedetto v. Scott Properties, Inc.
1988 Mass. App. Div. 31 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1988)
State v. Lunn
456 P.2d 216 (New Mexico Court of Appeals, 1969)
State v. Reznik
207 A.2d 77 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1964)
Takahashi v. Hecht Co.
64 F.2d 710 (D.C. Circuit, 1933)
Commonwealth v. Gettigan
252 Mass. 450 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1925)
Greenberg v. Greenberg
133 N.E. 18 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1921)