J.A.K. v. K.L.K.
456 S.W.3d 60
Opinion
ORDER
J.A.K. appeals the judgment of the trial court denying his motion to modify his obligation to pay maintenance to K.L.K. (“Respondent”) and awarding Respondent attorney’s fees. We find no error' has occurred.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memoran[61] dum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
J.A.K. v. K.L.K., 456 S.W.3d 60 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).
456 S.W.3d 60 (J.A.K. v. K.L.K.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.