J.A.K. v. K.L.K.

Missouri Court of Appeals

J.A.K. v. K.L.K.

456 S.W.3d 60

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 13, 2015

DocketNo. ED 101571

StatusPublished

This text of 456 S.W.3d 60 (J.A.K. v. K.L.K.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

J.A.K. v. K.L.K., 456 S.W.3d 60 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

J.A.K. appeals the judgment of the trial court denying his motion to modify his obligation to pay maintenance to K.L.K. (“Respondent”) and awarding Respondent attorney’s fees. We find no error' has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memoran[61]*61dum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

J.A.K. appeals the judgment of the trial court denying his motion to modify his obligation to pay maintenance to K.L.K. (“Respondent”) and awarding Respondent attorney’s fees. We find no error' has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memoran[61]*61dum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

456 S.W.3d 60, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jak-v-klk-moctapp-2015.