J.A.K. v. K.L.K.

456 S.W.3d 60, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 20, 2015 WL 164179
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 13, 2015·No. No. ED 101571·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

J.A.K. appeals the judgment of the trial court denying his motion to modify his obligation to pay maintenance to K.L.K. (“Respondent”) and awarding Respondent attorney’s fees. We find no error' has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memoran[61] dum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

J.A.K. v. K.L.K., 456 S.W.3d 60, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 20, 2015 WL 164179 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

456 S.W.3d 60 (J.A.K. v. K.L.K.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.