Jaheni v. State
This text of 635 S.E.2d 821 (Jaheni v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Following protracted post-trial proceedings, Sophonias Othello Jaheni seeks to appeal his 1998 convictions of various crimes. Unfortunately, the appeal must be dismissed because the notice of appeal was not filed by Jaheni’s appointed attorney.
In 1998, Jaheni was convicted of armed robbery, kidnapping, and other offenses and given sentences of imprisonment totaling 20 years. His appointed trial attorney was replaced by another attorney who, in 1999, moved for a new trial based on ineffective assistance of trial counsel. His appeal of the order denying his motion for new trial was never decided, because in 2001 we granted his motion to remand the case to the trial court for a hearing on his claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel.
A subsequent appeal by Jaheni was dismissed in 2003 because of his attorney’s failure to file an enumeration of errors and brief. In accordance with Rowland v. State,
Although a person has a state constitutional right to legal self-representation, counsel for a represented litigant generally must be a licensed attorney.2 Accordingly, Georgia Court of Appeals Rule 1 (a) provides that
[a]ll filings, documents, motions, briefs, requests and communications relating to appeals shall be in writing, shall be filed with the Clerk’s office [and] shall be signed by an attorney of record.... Documents with conformed signatures by law firm staff or an attorney’s employee will not be accepted.3
Therefore, only a duly licensed attorney may file a notice of appeal to this court on behalf of an individual who does not appear pro se.4 Because Jaheni’s notice of appeal was filed by a person not authorized to practice law in this state, the notice of appeal is ineffectual.5 “The proper and timely filing of a notice of appeal is an absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction upon the appellate court.”6 Because of the absence of a proper notice of appeal, this court is without jurisdiction to consider this appeal and it must be dismissed.
Because Jaheni is represented by counsel, he is again informed of the following in accordance with Rowland v. State:
Appeal dismissed. Ruffin,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
635 S.E.2d 821, 281 Ga. App. 213, 2006 Fulton County D. Rep. 2704, 2006 Ga. App. LEXIS 1051, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jaheni-v-state-gactapp-2006.