Jaggard v. Abbott Cardiovascular Systems Inc

Opinion

1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 5 |} RICHARD JAGGARD and JUDY JAGGARD, 6 Plaintiffs, Case No. 3:21-CV-000360-RCJ-CLB TV v. ORDER 8 || ABBOTT CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS, INC., a California corporation, and DOES 1 9 || through 50, INCLUSIVE, 10 Defendants. Wy Pending before the Court are Abbott Cardiovascular Systems Inc.’s motions for leave to

3 file under seal its Declaration of Brian J. Mooney, Esq. and accompanying exhibits in support of

4 Defendant Abbott Cardiovascular Systems, Inc’s reply brief in support of its bill of costs, (Dkt. 60

13 and 61). The motions are not opposed.

6 The good cause standard applies to the motions because the documents that the moving

7 party seek to seal are only tangentially related to the merits of the case. See Center for Auto Safety

18 v. Chrysler Grp., LLC, 809 F.3d 1092, 1101 (9th Cir. 2016).

19 The court finds that good cause exists for sealing these documents. Therefore, the motions

50 (Dkt. 60 and 61) are GRANTED.

5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 18, 2023. 22 ) 23 . ROBERT'G. JONES 24 United Stateb District Judge 1 .£1