Jagel Family Associates v. Havenbrook Associates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Jagel Family Associates v. Havenbrook Associates

209 A.D.2d 584, 619 N.Y.S.2d 665, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11455

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 21, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 209 A.D.2d 584 (Jagel Family Associates v. Havenbrook Associates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jagel Family Associates v. Havenbrook Associates, 209 A.D.2d 584, 619 N.Y.S.2d 665, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11455 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendants Haven-brook Associates and Breskel Associates appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Henry, J.), dated October 20, 1993, which, inter alia, confirmed a Referee’s report finding that those defendants owed the plaintiff the sum of $1,446,429.40 as of March 31, 1993, and directed that the premises be sold in one parcel at public auction.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The appellants’ contentions regarding the sufficiency of the papers submitted by the plaintiff to a Referee, as well as the Statute of Limitations issue, are without merit (see, Jagel Family Assocs. v Havenbrook Assocs., 209 AD2d 585 [decided [585]*585herewith]). Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Copertino and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendants Haven-brook Associates and Breskel Associates appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Henry, J.), dated October 20, 1993, which, inter alia, confirmed a Referee’s report finding that those defendants owed the plaintiff the sum of $1,446,429.40 as of March 31, 1993, and directed that the premises be sold in one parcel at public auction.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The appellants’ contentions regarding the sufficiency of the papers submitted by the plaintiff to a Referee, as well as the Statute of Limitations issue, are without merit (see, Jagel Family Assocs. v Havenbrook Assocs., 209 AD2d 585 [decided [585]*585herewith]). Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Copertino and Hart, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

209 A.D.2d 584, 619 N.Y.S.2d 665, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11455, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jagel-family-associates-v-havenbrook-associates-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack