Jaffe v. Weld
This text of 175 A.D. 970 (Jaffe v. Weld) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defects in the prior complaint heretofore found by this court and the Court of Appeals (See 155 App. Div. 110; 208 N. Y. 593) have not been met by the present amendment. The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion for judgment on the pleadings denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — [971]*971Clarke, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Dowling and Davis, JJ.; Laughlin and Davis, JJ., dissented. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
175 A.D. 970, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jaffe-v-weld-nyappdiv-1916.