Jaffe v. . Weld

102 N.E. 1104, 208 N.Y. 593, 1913 N.Y. LEXIS 1189
New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 29, 1913·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the negative. There can be no doubt of the rule that funds obtained by fraud may be followed through however many transmutations of form they may have passed so long as the rights of a third party for value and in good faith do not intervene; but this complaint, though prolix to a degree not easy to characterize, is so replete with hypothetical and alternative allegations that it is not possible on any reasonable interpretation to spell out any direct allegation that the *594 money obtained from these plaintiffs did in fact pass into the cotton upon which it is sought to impress a trust; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Werner,' Hiscock, Collin and Cuddeback, JJ.; Miller, J., takes no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jaffe v. . Weld, 102 N.E. 1104, 208 N.Y. 593, 1913 N.Y. LEXIS 1189 (N.Y. 1913).

102 N.E. 1104 (Jaffe v. . Weld) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Leibowits v. Leibowits
93 A.D.2d 535 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
In re Bank of Cuba
198 A.D. 733 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1921)
Weideman v. Newton Arms Co.
271 F. 302 (Second Circuit, 1921)
Legniti v. Mechanics & Metals National Bank
186 A.D. 105 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1919)
Jaffe v. . Weld
116 N.E. 73 (New York Court of Appeals, 1917)
Knauth, Nachod & Kuhne v. Latham & Co.
242 U.S. 426 (Supreme Court, 1917)
Jaffe v. Weld
175 A.D. 970 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1916)
German National Bank v. Carnegie Trust Co.
172 A.D. 158 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1916)
Schafuss v. Betts
94 Misc. 463 (New York Supreme Court, 1916)