Jacques v. Wellington Corp.

183 So. 22, 183 So. 718, 134 Fla. 211, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1088
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided October 11, 1938·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

On Petition for Rehearing

Per Curiam.

The petition for rehearing should be granted because this Court overlooked and failed to consider the force and effect of that part of the order here under review wherein the Circuit Judge said:

“The above styled and entitled cause comes on before this Court to be heard solely and only upon the petition of the petitioner filed July 21, 1938;”

On review of the Order of the Circuit Court the Appellate Court should confine itself to consideration of only those matters and questions which were before the lower court and should not go beyond the record made and appearing in the lower court.

The question of the power of the County Judge to direct *212 a verdict for either party was not presented to the lower court.

Rehearing granted.

Ellis, C. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur. Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Chapman, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jacques v. Wellington Corp., 183 So. 22, 183 So. 718, 134 Fla. 211, 1938 Fla. LEXIS 1088 (Fla. 1938).

183 So. 22 (Jacques v. Wellington Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ducharme v. State
690 So. 2d 1358 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Godshalk v. City of Winter Park
95 So. 2d 9 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1957)
Mariani v. Schleman
94 So. 2d 829 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1957)
Anders v. Anders
13 So. 2d 603 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1943)
Jacques v. Wellington Corp.
184 So. 766 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)